On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:04, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> If you want to tackle it, it would be a Good Idea to think through >> how it interacts with a wide selection of real-life filters. It >> looks unduly complex to derive from FilterProvider rules + filter >> properties, so I wonder if the least-bad solution would be yet >> another config option? > > Yes, maybe some more options for the FilterProtocol directive to add > to Vary or to set an env-var. But I am not going to work on this in > the near future, I was just wondering if I had missed something. > > I have filed PR 51312 about this problem.
Do you see FilterProtocol as worth building on? I've been looking on it as a legacy thing that should be deprecated in favour of filters declaring themselves with ap_register_output_filter_protocol . That's part of the half-baked-ness I mentioned. I guess so long as it exists we should update both in parallel. -- Nick Kew Available for work, contract or permanent http://www.webthing.com/~nick/cv.html
