On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 11:25:53AM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: > > I will think about a good way, how users can pass additional LDADD > > flags. Putting the "-R ..." into the LDFLAGS seems to be too heavy, > > because then the RPATH of every module etc. will contain the given > > directory. The real problematic cases are only mod_lua and in rare > > circumstances (you want to link against a non-standard zlib) > > mod_deflate. It might be enough to use APR_ADDTO() instead of direct > > assignment or APR_SETVAR() when setting the LDADD variables. I'll > > experiment. > > Using APR_ADDTO() for the MOD_XXX_LDADD worked nicely, so I used that > solution to allow users to easily prefix something to our LDADD detection.
Good idea, that looks useful. > > So would you also remove the current "ap_platform_runtime_link_flag" > > hack, which we only use for Solaris and which adds "-R ..." > > unconditional? Or should we stick, because although it is not right > > it is what did work in the past (for Solaris)? I'm neutral on this. It is odd to do it specifically for Solaris, but maybe Solaris is "different" somehow. Regards, Joe
