On Friday 26 August 2011, Greg Ames wrote: > ? Isn't "copy" going to be a new bucket on each pass of the > while() loop? Suppose we have 3 buckets and need to split buckets > #1 and #3 to satisfy the range. We also need a copy of bucket #2 > in the output brigade. I don't see where it is happening with > this patch.
True, that patch is broken, too :-( Will fix in a minute.