On 18 Oct 2011, at 21:22, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Igor Galić wrote: >>> On 10 Oct 2011, at 10:41, Nick Kew wrote: >>> >>>> Yep. Maybe calling it Location would be more consistent with >>>> our terminology? >>> >>> but would also be an inappropriate change if it hit existing users >>> who rely on the current "directory" semantics. So that becomes >>> (just) a note for the docs. >> >> mod_authn_socache has *current* users? >> Isn't it still beta? > > Nick, did you mean the "directory" config name should not be changed? Or the > behaviour? I hope the former, because the current behaviour is definitely a > bug. It could easily lead to misconfigurations that may cause security issues.
Yes, I agreed with your point. I wasn't clear whether you were proposing to fix it, but I'll be happy to take on that task when I'm back home. REgarding the name, I thought momentarily of a change, then decided against. Hence my two somewhat-contradictory posts! -- Nick Kew
