----- Original Message ----- > On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:31:59 +0100 > Stefan Fritsch <s...@sfritsch.de> wrote: > > > On Sunday 13 November 2011, Nick Kew wrote: > > > Indeed, checking those return values would be better. May have > > > been lost when I separated out the i18n code from its origins in > > > markup filtering. > > > > I have added some error checks and a few ap_asserts(). Do you want > > to > > review it before I merge it into 2.4? Do you have some setup where > > you > > can test the change? > > Great, thanks! > > Anything that might change behaviour outside of an error path? > If all you're doing is addressing Joe's concerns (whether by design > or coincidence) then please go right ahead and commit.
CTR (: > -- > Nick Kew i -- Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org/ GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE