On Saturday 03 December 2011, Nick Kew wrote: > On 2 Dec 2011, at 23:19, [email protected] wrote: > > Modified: > > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/include/ap_mmn.h > > httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/include/http_log.h > > [...] > > > + * 20111202.1 (2.5.0-dev) add APLOGNO() > > 2.4 or 2.5?
Changed it to 2.4. I guess we still need to update the comments in the trunk and 2.4.x ap_mmn.h files after the dust has settled. I guess the trunk file should get the history of 2.4.x, because that's what module authors need to take into account. > > Isn't this incompatible with being in a near-release beta state? > Could certainly use a couple of test releases before being > set in stone! There is no actual code change. Only a lot of strings added to error messages. But I would be fine with adding it later, too. Can some other people please voice their opinions?
