On Jan 11, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> Things look stable. >> Things look good. >> Things look happy. >> >> Sooooo are we ready to finally make this happen?? >> I offer to RM. > > Only outstanding issue from last series of thread I am aware of is > windows ssl socket reuse thing that causes sporadic empty responses. > > I don't know how we'd communicate that to early windows adopters > outside of e.g. the apachelounge community. >
Same way we did with 1.3.0 maybe? "At present, the Win95/NT port of Apache is not as stable as the UNIX version. Further releases of the 1.3.x tree will bring the Win95/NT port closer to parity."