On 1/22/2012 5:12 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Friday 20 January 2012, Joe Orton wrote: >> >> Good catch on ctx->bytes_in. I'd add: why is >> core_output_filter_ctx_t in a public header? > > There is no good reason other than that other core filter structs like > core_filter_ctx and core_net_rec are exposed, too. And those are > actually used by the winnt MPM. I would prefer if all these structs > were private and core_filters.c would provide an API to allocate them > from the winnt MPM and add additional buckets to the input brigade. > Is this something we should still do for 2.4.x (iff 2.4.0 is not > released)?
See also my observations about https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476
