Hold on... we're now gonna be shipping apu 1.4 w/ 2.2? Where was that decided? If we complain about using updated libtools/etc when building these, due to some perceived end-user risk, then certainly this introduces some "inconsistency" so late in the game for 2.2 users, doesn't it?
On Jan 25, 2012, at 4:46 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote: > Author: wrowe > Date: Wed Jan 25 21:46:22 2012 > New Revision: 1235968 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1235968&view=rev > Log: > A shining example why httpd had no business shipping apr/apu. > > Bump to pick up the current apu, which is a minor bump, not the subversion > rev. > > > Modified: > httpd/site/trunk/tools/release.sh > > Modified: httpd/site/trunk/tools/release.sh > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/site/trunk/tools/release.sh?rev=1235968&r1=1235967&r2=1235968&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/site/trunk/tools/release.sh (original) > +++ httpd/site/trunk/tools/release.sh Wed Jan 25 21:46:22 2012 > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ case "$1" in > > apr_xxx_in_srclib=1 > apr_tag="1.4.5" > - apu_tag="1.3.12" > + apu_tag="1.4.1" > ;; > > httpd-2.3) > >
