On 3/2/2012 2:14 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> 
> mod_firehose meets a need.  But my +1 has to be conditional on
> satisfactory integration of the complementary "firehose" utility
> alongside it, presumably in /bin/ .

That obligation is met.  minfrin acknowledges you could do more
than what the firehose extraction utility provides, but what is
there exists, and patches are [ALWAYS] welcome.

Reply via email to