On Mar 7, 2012, at 7:30 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 07 Mar 2012, at 1:58 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >>> Would we ever use this on the v2.4 branch at all? >>> >> >> Sure... assume a case with 2.4.10 and trunk has changed enough >> that to fix a bug in 2.4.10, there is no direct backport, but >> rather a one-off. > > Would it not be safer to give instructions to drop a particular path into the > tree in order to allocate a number, the same way the "build" directory is > dropped into the documentation tree? > > This could solve the tags-have-moved problem. >
Sure... whatever works :) I'm ez :)
