On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Michael Felt <[email protected]> wrote: > If you have something for AIX you want tested, just keep me posted. In other > words, is it already in trunk?
It is in trunk but needs to be modified before backport. I'll raise a flag once I think I'm done with the fixes, in case you can test again. (Thanks!) > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next... >> > Comments? Thoughts? >> >> sounds good generally >> >> I hope to help test ap_runtime_dir_relative() and potential exploiters >> more and also fix the AIX MPM load issue, which requires some rework >> to my trunk patch. >> >> > >> > On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> > >> >> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in >> >> time for the release. >> >> >> >> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and >> >> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an >> >> abs and relative value. >> >> >> >> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the >> >> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR >> >> to use the new api. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Born in Roswell... married an alien... > > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien...
