On 29 May 2012, at 8:50 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> Each branch different, 2.2 & 2.4 have some big differences between >> them in various areas. My 2 cents anyway. > What I'm perhaps more curious to get sorted out is whether we should > consider the trunk and the 2.4 documentation separate entities, or > whether they should be linked, comment-wise. Currently, they are pretty > much identical, but in the future it may be a good idea to keep them > separate as we move towards 2.5/2.6.
My gut feel is that trunk shouldn't have comments at all - trunk is fluid, and changes without warning. Comments are very likely to get stale and become more of a problem than a help. Regards, Graham --
