On 7/31/2012 3:27 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:11 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: >> On 7/18/2012 8:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Claudio Caldato (MS OPEN TECH) >>> <claud...@microsoft.com> wrote: >>>> I have a dev available now so we are ready to start. >>>> >>>> I have been out of the loop for a while so I’ll start by looking at >>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476, please point me >>>> to >>>> any other relevant information. And please add ‘Windows’ to the subject >>>> line >>>> for any Windows related issue so it will be easier for me to know which >>>> messages I have to read. >>>> >>>> I hope to have good news soon. >>> >>> Random question from the crowd... >>> >>> The WinNT MPM doesn't load the address of AcceptEx dynamically via >>> WSAIoctl, though that is a documented requirement and shown in the >>> AcceptEx sample I found. >>> >>> Is it possible that this results in flaky behavior depending on >>> third-party software installed? >> >> That is entirely possible but unlikely. The present flakey behavior is not >> surrounding AcceptEx(), it works for the vast majority of configurations >> until incomplete socket providers are added. But I'd be happy to see a patch >> to resolve AcceptEx dynamically. > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1363312
Looks great! Thanks for the patch :)
