On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:57:21AM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > I think this message is outdated and should be fixed. For 2.4.x and trunk its > even worse because it points to the no > longer existing apr-util/trunk. > Anyone opposed if I clean this up in the following way: > > 2.2.x: branches/1.4.x > 2.4.x: branches/1.5.x > trunk: trunk of APR
+1 here
