I can't recall either, but doing so in conjunction with the 2.0.65 release likely makes sense.
On Sep 30, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/30/2012 10:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> There was an email on users@httpd that reminded me that 2.0.65 has >> been long left in a holding pattern. >> >> Anyone opposed to me pushing for a 2.0.65 release by the >> end of this week? > > No opposition, but this does remind me about the when-will-2.0-be-EOL > conversation. I think consensus was 1 year after the first 2.4 release > but I don't think I've seen such an announcement (I could have just > missed it, too). > > -- > Daniel Ruggeri >
