On 25 Jan 2013, at 13:21, Daniel Gruno wrote: > [ ] +1: I support this proposal > [ ] 0: I don't care > [ ] -1: I don't support this proposal, because...
-1 as stated. +1 in principle. IMHO it needs a tiny change. Instead of creating a messy new DNS entry for "modules-archive", it should live under a single hostname: maybe modules.apache.org/archive/ I can't access modules.humbedooh.com right now, but I'll take what's there as of secondary importance: it's presumably intended more as startingpoint than final product. -- Nick Kew
