On 27.01.2013 01:08, gsm...@apache.org wrote: > Author: gsmith > Date: Sun Jan 27 00:08:04 2013 > New Revision: 1439000 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1439000&view=rev > Log: > mod_lua image size has surpassed 0x00010000, step it up a notch > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref > > Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref?rev=1439000&r1=1438999&r2=1439000&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/os/win32/BaseAddr.ref Sun Jan 27 00:08:04 2013 > @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ mod_socache_dc.so 0x6F8A0000 > mod_socache_memcache.so 0x6F890000 0x00010000 > mod_socache_shmcb.so 0x6F880000 0x00010000 > mod_sed.so 0x6F870000 0x00010000 > -mod_lua.so 0x6F860000 0x00010000 > +mod_lua.so 0x6F860000 0x00020000
Doesn't that mean the address needs to be 0x6F850000 to provide ample space before the mod_sed.so address? And then all addresses below mod_lua need to be lowered by 0x10000 as well? > mod_ratelimit.so 0x6F850000 0x00010000 > mod_remoteip.so 0x6F840000 0x00010000 > mod_lbmethod_bybusyness.so 0x6F830000 0x00010000 Regards, Rainer
