On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:15:45 -0500 Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Rainer Jung > <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: > > On 18.02.2013 19:02, Eric Covener wrote: > >> I am on the road right now, but a user reported that my fix to make > >> rewritebase merging opt-in is busted and breaks normal override by > >> default. Can someone look/repair/propose for 24? > > > > You beat me to it. > > > > If we think that the merging/inheritance of RewriteBase by default > > is wrong, we should also backport your RewriteOption MergeBase > > (r1418954) and the tiny fix for it you just now added to the 2.4 > > STATUS to 2.2 as well? At least we have PR 53963 open about the new > > merge behavior in 2.2.23. > > > > I guess I will add a backport suggestion to the 2.2.x STATUS. > > Yes I agree, that original report actually has no relief queued up in > 2.2.24. > > The reporter contacted me off-list and was running a personal build > with the trunk change in 2.2 and realized it was broken. Ok, so 2.2.23 had not suffered this regression yet? If not, we should just move ahead and then can consider any improved behavior in 2.2.x. There are no changes to mod_rewrite in 2.2.x since 2.2.23 was tagged.
