-deps for 2.4.4 are not released, so it's a non-issue for 2.4.x. I can't recall if we bundle apr/apu with 2.2.x but if we do, then I say simply rerolling with apu-1.4 instead of apu-1.5 is fine.
On Feb 20, 2013, at 1:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:58:07 -0500 > Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1: OSX 10.8.2, Fedora 16 and 18 (x86_64) and CentOS 6 (x86_64) > > So what is your thinking on the apr-util 1.5.1 crypt mess? > > Should we re-roll 2.4.4 deps and either re-roll 2.2.24 with a > corrected roll-release script to pull in 1.4.1? Or roll on to > 2.2.25? IMHO this doesn't warrant a new version number since > there is no delta to the svn sources. > > Based on reports so far, I'm -1 to moving the current 2.4.4-deps > or 2.2.24 from /dev/dist into /dist/httpd because we would be > releasing, or endorsing 1.5.1 and it doesn't seem ready. >
