On 06 Mar 2013, at 12:04 PM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I've been working on a patch for mod_cache to deal (fully) with the >> response header Cache-Control and the no-cache=<header> or private=<header> >> directives. > > I realize that, maybe, the patch should have been included in the > message, rather than in an attachment, for it to be read quickly. > So let me reply to myself with the patch below (which is not a big deal)... > > Or maybe is there a reason not to include that functionality in > mod_cache, with most of the code being already there ? > I could not find any relative discussion in the list nor anywhere > (about mod_cache, but to say it is not implemented). I reviewed the patch and it looks sane, but my schedule has been insane, and I need some sleep before I commit this. Should have time over the weekend if not before. Complying with all of the RFC is the goal of mod_cache, thank you for contributing this. Regards, Graham --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
