On 04/19/2013 06:25 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > Daniel, > On 19.04.2013 18:19, Guenter Knauf wrote: >> On 19.04.2013 16:29, Daniel Gruno wrote: >>> See r1469844 >> yeah, thought as much when I printed the result which showed 0 or 1; >> but I had to leave so couldnt self dig into the code ATM ... > wouldnt it be even more uselful to have instead a > r.get_config_define(string) so that we could also get the value of the > define if there's any? > > Gün. > > Yes, it would, but it's not as easy to wrap around as exists_config_define ;) I'll take a look at replacing the function today, hopefully I'll get somewhere.
With regards, Daniel.
