On 09 May 2013, at 12:36 AM, Roy T. Fielding <field...@gbiv.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, I am at the tail end of a long standards meeting and > haven't slept much for three days. Have you checked to see if the > descriptions changed in HTTPbis p6? RFC2616 hasn't been relevant > for a while now. > > http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/httpbis/draft-ietf-httpbis/latest/p6-cache.html > > I'll look at it tomorrow when I have slept a bit. I had done, but I hadn't found anything different to RFC2616. There is the letter of law, and the spirit of the law, keen to see what the spirit of the law is to work out the right way to handle this. Regards, Graham --
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
