>> Perhaps this time, we entertain a proper vote rather than a pair of >> devs electing to change defaults on a whim. Stable branches are >> RTC for a reason. > > Huh? We had three devs voting for the backport. What more do you want?
FWIW I noticed in archive that sf was left off in the commit message but was in the STATUS entry. I would have been a fourth on concept (both needing the directive and the default change) but either didn't see it in time or was gun shy of mod_ssl/openssl (most of my exeperience is with a proprietary alternative to both where I made the same change)
