I just have it there as a place holder so we don't forget it. (notice that that +1 line is blank)
On Jun 13, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > j...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: jim >> Date: Thu Jun 13 15:30:01 2013 >> New Revision: 1492706 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1492706 >> Log: >> other possible backports >> >> Modified: >> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >> >> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS?rev=1492706&r1=1492705&r2=1492706&view=diff >> ============================================================================== > >> @@ -211,7 +211,29 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: >> trunk patch: >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1482522 >> 2.4.x patch: trunk patch works modulo CHANGES and ap_mmn >> +1: >> - >> + >> + * mod_proxy: support Unix domain sockets >> + trunk patch: >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1451633 >> + >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1451905 >> + >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1451921 >> + >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1452259 >> + >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1453981 >> + 2.4.x patch: trunk patch works modulo CHANGES and ap_mmn >> + +1: >> + >> + * mod_proxy: Ensure network errors detected by the proxy are returned as >> + 504 Gateway Timout as opposed to 502 Bad Gateway >> + trunk patch: >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1480058 >> + 2.4.x patch: trunk patch works modulo CHANGES >> + +1: > > This one is still disputed and we are waiting for Roy's final judgement about > what is correct here. > So I would oppose backporting it at this point of time. > > > Regards > > Rüdiger >
