On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunder...@bigfoot.com > wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:38:50AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> > + +0.5: jj: I would prefer if this sat in trunk for a few months > first > >> OT and maybe a dumb question, but if something got two +1's and two > >> +0.5's, would it be considered approved or not? > > Perhaps the ITK guy could test the interface and report back. That, not > > time, is what we need. I'll look for the right thread. > > Is this interface changed or not? If it's a backport of what's in trunk > (r1389339), it's essentially what the 2.4.x branch of mpm-itk already uses. > If not, I'll need to change the code to use the new hook, and then re-test > (testing this is a bit icky). > See the next e-mail, which has a pointer to the exact patch under consideration ;) > > /* Steinar */ > -- > Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
