On Tuesday 09 July 2013, Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Jan Kaluza wrote: > > I agree 20 bytes could be too much. I have changed my patch to > > have only 10 bytes long root. I will check the Daniel's ideas > > mentioned in another mail in this thread and try to implement > > it, but if we are going to do it my way, I think this patch > > should be OK. > > +1 here, this looks good to me.
+1 > Any objections to this approach?
