On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Let's move this to dev@httpd and omit dev@apr (after this e-mail)...
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:28 AM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> On 2013-11-22 00:08, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:48 PM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> sorry for late response to apr-1.5.0 ...
>> >>
>> >> I've done some tests with apr-1.5.0 on FreeBSD 10 (amd64)
>> >> and it seems there is an issue that breaks apache24.
>> >>
>> >> With apr-1.5.0 apache22 works but apache24 is broken.
>> >> apache starts fine, nothing special in the logs or during
>> >> start with -X but no response is coming back.
>> >>
>> >> apr/apr-util test:
>> >> ========================================
>> >> apr-1.5.0:      all tests passed [1]
>> >> apr-util-1.5.3: all tests passed
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> working configurations (FreeBSD beta3 [1]
>> >> =========================================
>> >> apache22-2.2.26 apr-1.4.8 apr-util-1.5.3
>> >> apache22-2.2.26 apr-1.5.0 apr-util-1.5.3
>> >> apache24-2.4.6  apr-1.4.8 apr-util-1.5.2
>> >> apache24-2.4.7  apr-1.4.8 apr-util-1.5.2
>> >> apache24-2.4.6  apr-1.4.8 apr-util-1.5.3
>> >> apache24-2.4.7  apr-1.4.8 apr-util-1.5.3
>> >>
>> >> broken combinations:
>> >> =========================================
>> >> apache24-2.4.6  apr-1.5.0 apr-util-1.5.3
>> >> apache24-2.4.7  apr-1.5.0 apr-util-1.5.3
>> >>
>> >> All tests where done with MPM worker.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> FreeBSD 8.4 (amd64) seems OK in all combinations
>> >> FreeBSD 9.2 (amd64) seems OK in all combinations
>> >>
>> >> [1] FreeBSD 10 beta3 with iconv UTF7 patch r258316
>> >> (head/lib/libiconv_modules/UTF7/citrus_utf7.c)
>> >>
>> >> Any hints where to start?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Set LogLevel trace8 and compare good vs. bad.
>> > Start with -X then attach with dtruss and compare good vs. bad.
>> > Get open fds displayed by lsof and compare good vs. bad.
>> > Is connection to client held open?  Get backtraces.
>> >
>> > I just compared 1.4.8 vs. 1.5.0 and didn't see anything that looked
>> > remotely likely.
>> >
>>
>> Comparing trace8 outputs showed the request is processed
>> but the following code snippet in server/core_filters.c
>> never get TRUE except the client cancels the request.
>>
>> To get some better log entries I've used server/core_filters.c
>> r1510295 from trunk.
>>
>>
>> @@server/core_filters.c (line 510)
>> if (APR_BUCKET_IS_FLUSH(bucket)
>>     || non_file_bytes_in_brigade >= THRESHOLD_MAX_BUFFER
>>     || morphing_bucket_in_brigade
>>     || eor_buckets_in_brigade > MAX_REQUESTS_IN_PIPELINE) {
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> [http:trace3] http_filters.c(974):[client x.x.x.x:x] Response sent with
>> status 200, headers:
>> [http:trace5] http_filters.c(983):[client x.x.x.x:x]   Date: Sun, 24 Nov
>> 2013 10:28:37 GMT
>> [http:trace5] http_filters.c(986):[client x.x.x.x:x]   Server:
>> Apache/2.4.7 (FreeBSD)
>> [http:trace4] http_filters.c(804):[client x.x.x.x:x]   Last-Modified:
>> Sat, 23 Nov 2013 16:51:58 GMT
>> [http:trace4] http_filters.c(804):[client x.x.x.x:x]   ETag:
>> \\"be-4ebdaf2ef2780\\"
>> [http:trace4] http_filters.c(804):[client x.x.x.x:x]   Accept-Ranges:
>> bytes
>> [http:trace4] http_filters.c(804):[client x.x.x.x:x]   Content-Length: 190
>> [http:trace4] http_filters.c(804):[client x.x.x.x:x]   Keep-Alive:
>> timeout=5, max=100
>> [http:trace4] http_filters.c(804):[client x.x.x.x:x]   Connection:
>> Keep-Alive
>> [http:trace4] http_filters.c(804):[client x.x.x.x:x]   Content-Type:
>> text/html
>> [core:trace8] core_filters.c(576):[client x.x.x.x:x] brigade contains:
>> bytes: 284, non-file bytes: 284, eor buckets: 0, morphing buckets: 0
>> [core:trace8] core_filters.c(576):[client x.x.x.x:x] brigade contains:
>> bytes: 474, non-file bytes: 284, eor buckets: 0, morphing buckets: 0
>> [core:trace8] core_filters.c(576):[client x.x.x.x:x] brigade contains:
>> bytes: 474, non-file bytes: 284, eor buckets: 1, morphing buckets: 0
>>
>>
>> This following lines are only seen if
>>   apr-1-5.0 was build without IPv6 support
>>   or apache24 was build with v4-mapping enabled
>>   or "Listen $IP:$port" is given in httpd.conf
>>
>> [core:trace6] core_filters.c(526):[client x.x.x.x:x] will flush because
>> of FLUSH bucket
>> [core:trace8] core_filters.c(528):[client x.x.x.x:x] seen in brigade so
>> far: bytes: 474, non-file bytes: 284, eor buckets: 1, morphing buckets: 0
>> [core:trace8] core_filters.c(555):[client x.x.x.x:x] flushing now
>> [core:trace8] core_filters.c(568):[client x.x.x.x:x] total bytes written:
>> 474
>> [core:trace8] core_filters.c(576):[client x.x.x.x:x] brigade contains:
>> bytes: 0, non-file bytes: 0, eor buckets: 0, morphing buckets: 0
>>
>> However a flush is triggered if the client cancels the request, but no
>> data is sent over the wire ...
>>
>>
>> I've searched if other also have seen a similar issue and found
>> instead the following interesting article from Nov. 2002 ;)
>> http://people.apache.org/~trawick/v4mapped.html
>>
>>
> I haven't analyzed the trace messages you showed above.  Here's what I did
> on FreeBSD 9:
>
> Apply this patch to fix the version check for disabling v4mapped addresses:
>
> Index: configure.in
> ===================================================================
> --- configure.in (revision 1545127)
> +++ configure.in (working copy)
> @@ -774,7 +774,10 @@
>  ],
>  [
>      case $host in
> -    *freebsd5*|*netbsd*|*openbsd*)
> +    *freebsd[1234].*)
> +        v4mapped=yes
> +        ;;
> +    *freebsd*|*netbsd*|*openbsd*)
>          v4mapped=no
>          ;;
>      *)
>
> That gives me
>
> $ bin/apachectl -V
> AH00558: httpd: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified
> domain name, using 127.0.0.1. Set the 'ServerName' directive globally to
> suppress this message
> Server version: Apache/2.4.8-dev (Unix)
> Server built:   Nov 24 2013 20:21:30
> Server's Module Magic Number: 20120211:27
> Server loaded:  APR 1.5.1-dev, APR-UTIL 1.5.4-dev
> Compiled using: APR 1.5.1-dev, APR-UTIL 1.5.4-dev
> Architecture:   64-bit
> Server MPM:     worker
>   threaded:     yes (fixed thread count)
>     forked:     yes (variable process count)
> Server compiled with....
>  -D APR_HAS_SENDFILE
>  -D APR_HAS_MMAP
>  -D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses disabled)
>
> The last line shown indicates that mapped addresses are disabled in this
> build.
>
> The only Listen I have is "Listen 8080".  procstat says I have separate
> sockets, as expected:
>
> 60734 httpd               3 s - rw---n---   9       0 TCP ::.8080 ::.0
> 60734 httpd               4 s - rw---n---   9       0 TCP 0.0.0.0:8080
> 0.0.0.0:0
>
> From netstat:
>
> tcp4       0      0 *.8080                 *.*                    LISTEN
> tcp6       0      0 *.8080                 *.*                    LISTEN
>
> (You had shown sockstat before; this is the same stuff.)
>
> --/--
>
> Are you able to check for the issue on FreeBSD 9?
>
> When it hangs, are you connecting to the IPv4 listener or the IPv6
> listener?  Does it matter whether you use loopback or the address of a
> network interface?
>
> You're using a regular web browser in the failing case, right?  Have you
> tried something as simple as netcat for the failing address/port?  Example:
>
> $ echo "GET /" | nc 127.0.0.1 8080
> <html><body><h1>It works!</h1></body></html>
>
> --
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
> http://emptyhammock.com/
>

I see the hang on FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 using the same sources, though clang is
installed instead of gcc.

FWIW, the simple "GET /<EOF>" request works but an HTTP/1.1 request from
telnet or from Firefox hangs.  I am able to try loopback over IPv4 and IPv6
and they both hang.

Now move the gcc binaries from FreeBSD 9 to FreeBSD 10 (along with
libpcre.0): I don't see the hang with the simple testcases that triggered
it with the clang builds.

I wouldn't be surprised if your apr-1.5-as-trigger observation reflects
"accidents" like code moving around and/or changing in size.  I didn't see
any interesting changes in the source that would affect the path where the
hang occurs.  But who really knows :)

-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/

Reply via email to