On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 09:04:53 +0100 Kaspar Brand <httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch> wrote:
> I won't defend the checks introduced with r757373 under all > circumstances, but they are definitely not the cause for this > purported defect. I beg to differ. We are left with a question of whether you are responsible to defend the current behavior, or whether I can simply rely on RFC2817 to document that you are wrong, or whether I'm instead responsible to identify user-agent by user-agent those which comply with RFC2817's examples. So how do you want to do this, or would you like to return to a discussion of ProxyPass in the forward proxy context?
