On Dec 27, 2013, at 14:57, Justin Erenkrantz <[email protected]> wrote:
> The use case here is that someone could store a zero-byte file inside of > radosgw. Amazon's S3 clients expect to see a Content-Length on HEAD requests > - IOW, they don't infer the lack of a Content-Length as being '0'. If we > weren't comfortable allowing this as a default, I'm guessing that we could > expose this as a directive override. Why would that not be a reasonable default? Ask
