Hello Jim,
I would like to make a suggestion that is off topic from the last couple
of replies but pertinent to a T&R of 2.4.8.
If anyone is interested in having mod_remoteip work correctly in Apache
httpd 2.4.8,
then the following bug reports and patches might be worth considering:
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54651
- This is my reworking to an attachment of a patch that was first
presented over a year ago.
- This is an essential patch for mod_remoteip to correctly process
RemoteIPHeader headers that contain a list of IP addresses.
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55972
- This is a fix to an obvious error that I recently discovered
while studying mod_remoteip.c.
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55962
- This is my implementation of an idea suggested by William A. Rowe Jr.
- This one could bring a slight improvement in behavior to some
unlikely use cases.
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55886
- This one is analysis on the question of what should appear in the
client field on the server-status page after mod_remoteip works its magic.
I am available to help with any further work that might be needed here.
Thanks,
Mike Rumph
On 1/9/2014 5:33 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
"defect"?
We support UDS in ProxyPass. We don't in mod_rewrite.
Nor do we claim to. I don't think that's a "defect".
If later on UDS support is *also* added to mod_rewrite,
then good. But not having it there isn't, IMO, any
reason to not include it where we say it is, and
where we see it works.
On Jan 9, 2014, at 1:29 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:01:58 -0500
Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Blaise Tarr <blaise.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
So mod_rewrite is not recognizing the "unix:" prefix as being
valid. I temporarily commented out the call of fully_qualify_uri(r)
at mod_rewrite.c:4130, and now r->filename is set correctly:
Yes, right now the UDS support is only valid directly via mod_proxy,
and the required hooks in mod_rewrite need to be done and
currently isn't supported.
I don't see that as a big issue, currently. ;)
No, it's currently not an issue, we haven't introduced that defect into
a release branch.
Are you suggesting we hold off on the UDS support? Or the 2.4.8 tag?
Or that new defects are interesting challenges for users?
