On Thursday 20 February 2014 16:13:01 Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:04 AM, André Malo <n...@perlig.de> wrote: > > Anyone? > > > > The doc build tools are confused as well ;-) > > > > nd > > > > On Sunday 16 February 2014 15:58:18 André Malo wrote: > >> Hi there, > >> > >> We do have one duplicate directive in our tree: HeartbeatStorage > >> (defined in mod_lbmethod_heartbeat.c and mod_heartmonitor.c) > >> > >> I find this confusing. How does it work? Without digging through the > >> config code: are they even both initialized? What if they were defined > >> with different syntax specs? Or is it just a mistake? > > I do recall it is viable for two modules to use the same directive and > both get called back when it's specified. They could have differeng > TAKE12, RAW_ARGS, etc as long as the actual args were compatible with > both.
Hmm. Then it's still the question, why would we want that? It looks to me like a design error (besides, as said, it's confusing). I'm not sure, when I'll get around to dig through the code. So, if someone can help here, it would be appreciated :-) nd
