William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > I believe that Kaspar and Ruediger are still entirely at odds with my > position, but this 'enhancement' should never have been unilaterally > applied as it was to 2.2.26 and must be reverted (even as the feature > is 'fixed' with corrections they have blessed), e.g. the comparison > must be constrained to apply only to SSLStrictSNIVHostCheck enforcing > hosts under 2.2 to not break existing configurations.
Have you checked if http://svn.apache.org/r1553204 and http://svn.apache.org/r1555240 fix your pain? This is only in trunk yet, but I would be happy to propose it for backport to 2.4.x and 2.2.x. Regards Rüdiger
