> -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Dienstag, 25. Februar 2014 14:09 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: mod_rewrite/proxy UDS issues > > > On Feb 25, 2014, at 7:26 AM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > Should this simply work? > > > > The use of the UDS path in <Proxy> statements is not supported; > I never anticipated the need for it.. It's a ProxyPass and/or > BalancerMember > "enhancement" (ie: anything that defines a "worker" instead of > a "path").
But IMHO it should for consistency reasons and in order to set options on these workers when using mod_rewrite. Regards Rüdiger
