On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group < ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com> wrote:
> Go ahead and commit it. We can update the backport proposal for 2.2.x > afterwards and propose it as a new one to 2.4.x. > Commited to trunk and backport proposed to 2.4.x. For 2.2.x I'm not sure how to proceed since there is already 3 votes (including mine) for the two first patches. Should I simply add the third patch in the same entry (which I guess would invalidate the existing votes) or create a new entry like in 2.4.x? > > > Regards > > > > Rüdiger > > > > *From:* Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic....@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Donnerstag, 27. Februar 2014 12:36 > *To:* httpd > *Subject:* PR 50335 missing patch? > > > > Hi, > > the patch proposed by Rüdiger at > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335#c30 has not been > commited in trunk (nor backported...). > > Shouldn't it to fully address the issue? > > It seems that the error path is concerned too (since conn->scpool is still > destroyed before r->pool). > > > > Regards; > > Yann. >
