Just looking for verification here ;) Thx! On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:
> As noted, from how I understand it, currently we allow it to > build BUT the behavior is not as expected or designed, since > the expected behavior *requires* PCRE_DUPNAMES. If we require > PCRE_DUPNAMES then we require it, right? >
