Just looking for verification here ;)

Thx!
On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:

> As noted, from how I understand it, currently we allow it to
> build BUT the behavior is not as expected or designed, since
> the expected behavior *requires* PCRE_DUPNAMES. If we require
> PCRE_DUPNAMES then we require it, right?
> 

Reply via email to