On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Brian J. France <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 30, 2014, at 6:54 AM, Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> One second is too low imo (cf. PR above). > > Yes, 1 is way to low, even 60 doesn't help us with the RHEL 6 kernel bug. > > I am trying to get time to work on a patch that would allow something like > this: > > AcceptFilter data:60 > > for 2.2.x. That is the only way I can see to allow tweaking the time and > staying binary compatible with 2.2.x.
Good idea, that could be so in trunk/2.4.x too (2.4.x has the same constraints), no? I'd suggest the name "defer" rather than "data" though. Thanks, Yann.
