Hmm... yeah, maybe. Good idea on the README/STATUS. On Jun 24, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Eric Covener <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ideally, I'd like to have eventopt backported to 2.4, so others >> wishing (and working) towards the same thing, would be GREAT. > > I thought the changes were more subtle than the OP implies. Maybe a > README or STATUS specific to eventopt/ would help? >
