Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 04:29:17PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: >> One more tweak here, proposed by Hubert from our QA team who has been >> reviewing all this stuff. Hubert argued we should be erring on the side >> of stronger not weaker here, particularly because of the possibility of >> 2048-bit keys being identified as 2047 in rare cases. > > I was reminded that there was a request to use the larger key sizes as > well. So with apologies, I over-engineered this even more: > > Any comments/objections/hatemail?
+1 Regards Rüdiger
