btw: I ran (as best I could) ApacheTest against 2.4.10. On the one hand,
all tests it did passed, but it skipped several, which surprises me
somewhat - because I thought I had all mods enabled in the build.
tail...
t/security/CVE-2009-1890............skipped
all skipped: cannot find module 'mod_proxy', cannot find module
'proxy_http.c'
t/security/CVE-2009-3555............skipped
all skipped: cannot find module 'ssl'
t/security/CVE-2011-3368-rewrite....skipped
all skipped: cannot find module 'rewrite'
t/security/CVE-2011-3368............skipped
all skipped: cannot find module 'proxy'
t/ssl/all...........................skipped
all skipped: cannot find module 'mod_ssl'
All tests successful, 56 tests and 29 subtests skipped.
Files=97, Tests=2894, 369 wallclock secs (85.19 cusr + 80.86 csys = 166.05
CPU)
[warning] server loopback:8529 shutdown
[warning] port 8529 still in use...
......done
Where should I be looking to correct this?
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> the good news: "user" error. I had removed coreutils so I was relying on
> the default /usr/bin/install program. Once replaced with coreutils install
> program everything worked as expected.
>
> So, back to FYI only for the compile warnings.
>
> (Or, a storm in my glass of water)
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> correction: I did not pay attention to the .. in the symbolic name. It
>> does reference the file correctly.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ran same command again, but rather that sh -x, used option --debug
>>>
>>> This is what I get from func_mode_install - where it fails above.
>>>
>>> + func_mode_install mod_mpm_worker.la
>>> /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec/
>>> + test install = /bin/sh
>>> + test install = /bin/sh
>>> + false
>>> + install_prog=
>>> + arg=install
>>> + func_quote_for_eval install
>>> + install_prog=install
>>> + install_shared_prog=install
>>> + install_cp=false
>>> + dest=
>>> + files=
>>> + opts=
>>> + prev=
>>> + install_type=
>>> + isdir=no
>>> + stripme=
>>> + no_mode=:
>>> + arg2=
>>> + test -n
>>> + test -n
>>> + dest=mod_mpm_worker.la
>>> + continue
>>> + arg2=
>>> + test -n mod_mpm_worker.la
>>> + files= mod_mpm_worker.la
>>> + dest=/var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec/
>>> + continue
>>> + test -z install
>>> + test -n
>>> + test -n
>>> + test -z mod_mpm_worker.la
>>> + func_stripname / /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec/
>>> + dest=/var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec
>>> + test -d /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec
>>> + isdir=yes
>>> + test yes = yes
>>> + destdir=/var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec
>>> + destname=
>>> + libtool_install_magic=%%%MAGIC variable%%%
>>> + staticlibs=
>>> + future_libdirs=
>>> + current_libdirs=
>>> + func_resolve_sysroot mod_mpm_worker.la
>>> + file=mod_mpm_worker.la
>>> + func_lalib_unsafe_p mod_mpm_worker.la
>>> + func_fatal_help `mod_mpm_worker.la' is not a valid libtool archive
>>>
>>> libtool: install: `mod_mpm_worker.la' is not a valid libtool archive
>>> libtool: install: Try `libtool --help --mode=install' for more
>>> information.
>>>
>>> FYI: the contents of mod_mpm_worker.la is:
>>> root@x093:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/httpd-2.4.10]cat ./server/mpm/worker/
>>> mod_mpm_worker.la
>>> # mod_mpm_worker.la - a libtool library file
>>> # Generated by libtool (GNU libtool) 2.4.2
>>> #
>>> # Please DO NOT delete this file!
>>> # It is necessary for linking the library.
>>>
>>> # The name that we can dlopen(3).
>>> dlname='mod_mpm_worker.so'
>>>
>>> # Names of this library.
>>> library_names='mod_mpm_worker.so mod_mpm_worker.so mod_mpm_worker.so'
>>>
>>> # The name of the static archive.
>>> old_library='mod_mpm_worker.a'
>>>
>>> # Linker flags that can not go in dependency_libs.
>>> inherited_linker_flags=''
>>>
>>> # Libraries that this one depends upon.
>>> dependency_libs=' -L/usr/include/openssl/lib'
>>>
>>> # Names of additional weak libraries provided by this library
>>> weak_library_names=''
>>>
>>> # Version information for mod_mpm_worker.
>>> current=0
>>> age=0
>>> revision=0
>>>
>>> # Is this an already installed library?
>>> installed=no
>>>
>>> # Should we warn about portability when linking against -modules?
>>> shouldnotlink=yes
>>>
>>> # Files to dlopen/dlpreopen
>>> dlopen=''
>>> dlpreopen=''
>>>
>>> # Directory that this library needs to be installed in:
>>> libdir='/opt/httpd/libexec'
>>>
>>> However, I think the problem might be the self-referencing
>>> mod_mpm_worker.la in .libs
>>>
>>> root@x093:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/httpd-2.4.10]find . -name
>>> mod_mpm_worker.\* -ls
>>> 137301550 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root system 987 Aug 1 09:07
>>> ./server/mpm/worker/mod_mpm_worker.la
>>> 137301549 57 -rw-r--r-- 1 root system 57455 Aug 1 09:07
>>> ./server/mpm/worker/.libs/mod_mpm_worker.a
>>> 137301547 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root system 188 Aug 1 09:07
>>> ./server/mpm/worker/.libs/mod_mpm_worker.exp
>>> 137301552 1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root system 20 Aug 1 09:07
>>> ./server/mpm/worker/.libs/mod_mpm_worker.la -> ../mod_mpm_worker.la
>>> 137301548 86 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root system 87823 Aug 1 09:07
>>> ./server/mpm/worker/.libs/mod_mpm_worker.so
>>> 137301551 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root system 988 Aug 1 09:07
>>> ./server/mpm/worker/.libs/mod_mpm_worker.lai
>>>
>>> Will try modifying the symbolic link to the real file, and see how it
>>> works, or does not.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ran
>>>> # sh -x /var/apr/build-1/libtool --mode=install install
>>>> mod_mpm_worker.la /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec/
>>>>
>>>> got:
>>>> ...
>>>> + func_mode_install mod_mpm_worker.la
>>>> /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec/
>>>> libtool: install: `mod_mpm_worker.la' is not a valid libtool archive
>>>> libtool: install: Try `libtool --help --mode=install' for more
>>>> information.
>>>> root@x093:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/httpd-2.4.10]
>>>>
>>>> This is what I am starting from.
>>>> root@x093:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/httpd-2.4.10]find . -name
>>>> mod_mpm_worker.\*
>>>> ./server/mpm/worker/mod_mpm_worker.la
>>>> ./server/mpm/worker/.libs/mod_mpm_worker.a
>>>> ./server/mpm/worker/.libs/mod_mpm_worker.exp
>>>> ./server/mpm/worker/.libs/mod_mpm_worker.la
>>>> ./server/mpm/worker/.libs/mod_mpm_worker.so
>>>> ./server/mpm/worker/.libs/mod_mpm_worker.lai
>>>> root@x093:[/data/prj/apache/httpd/httpd-2.4.10]
>>>>
>>>> My gut feeling is that the problem here, and the one I have with PHP
>>>> (and instdso.sh) are related, i.e., in apr.
>>>>
>>>> Something else I saw and have some concern about (in the ... stuff) is
>>>> the assumption that linux==unix.
>>>>
>>>> with some context - the line: version_type=linux
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>> + OTOOL=
>>>> + OTOOL64=
>>>> + libext=a
>>>> + shrext_cmds=.so
>>>> + extract_expsyms_cmds=
>>>> + variables_saved_for_relink=PATH LIBPATH
>>>> + need_lib_prefix=no
>>>> + need_version=no
>>>> + version_type=linux
>>>> + runpath_var=
>>>> + shlibpath_var=LIBPATH
>>>> + shlibpath_overrides_runpath=unknown
>>>> + libname_spec=lib$name
>>>> + library_names_spec=${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$versuffix
>>>> ${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major $libname${shared_ext}
>>>> + soname_spec=
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> And, if it is not apr, then it is libtool again - but why was it
>>>> working fine with 2.4.7 and 2.2.27?
>>>>
>>>> ASF.apr-vac.rte 1.5.1.0 C F apr-vac version
>>>> 1.5.1 for
>>>> ASF.apu-vac.rte 1.5.3.0 C F apu-vac version
>>>> 1.5.3 for
>>>>
>>>> So, apr == version 1.5.1, and apr-util is version 1.5.3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> All was looking "normal" (I will make a small patch for the
>>>>> buildaix.ksh script to increase the value for MAXMEM) - however, at the
>>>>> end
>>>>> there is an error (when installing to a DESTDIR).
>>>>> build ends with:
>>>>>
>>>>> find: bad status--
>>>>> /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec/mod_mpm_worker.so
>>>>> install: File mod_mpm_worker.so was not found.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I shall be looking into that later - however, if anyone has an
>>>>> idea/suggestion - please do not hesitate to comment.
>>>>>
>>>>> p.s. I recall something like this happening before, but what that was
>>>>> - I have forgotten.
>>>>>
>>>>> ===
>>>>> + make > build/aix/make.out
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1595.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const void*)"
>>>>> is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1596.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const void*)"
>>>>> is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1597.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const void*)"
>>>>> is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1598.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const void*)"
>>>>> is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1603.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1604.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1605.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1606.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1608.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1609.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1610.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1611.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1612.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1613.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1614.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1615.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1616.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1617.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1618.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1619.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1620.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1621.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1626.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1627.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1628.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1629.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1630.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1631.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1632.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1633.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1634.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1635.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1636.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1637.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1638.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1639.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1644.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1645.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1646.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> "util_expr_eval.c", line 1647.7: 1506-196 (W) Initialization between
>>>>> types "const void* const" and "int(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const
>>>>> char*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> 1500-030: (I) INFORMATION: cache_save_filter: Additional
>>>>> optimization may be attained by recompiling and specifying MAXMEM option
>>>>> with a value greater than 8192.
>>>>> "mod_include.c", line 721.26: 1506-068 (W) Operation between types
>>>>> "const void*" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const void*,const char*)"
>>>>> is not allowed.
>>>>> 1500-030: (I) INFORMATION: deflate_out_filter: Additional
>>>>> optimization may be attained by recompiling and specifying MAXMEM option
>>>>> with a value greater than 8192.
>>>>> "mod_headers.c", line 971.43: 1506-280 (W) Function argument
>>>>> assignment between types "const void*" and "const char*(*)(struct
>>>>> request_rec*,char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> 1500-030: (I) INFORMATION: proxy_ftp_handler: Additional
>>>>> optimization may be attained by recompiling and specifying MAXMEM option
>>>>> with a value greater than 8192.
>>>>> 1500-030: (I) INFORMATION: ap_proxy_ajp_request: Additional
>>>>> optimization may be attained by recompiling and specifying MAXMEM option
>>>>> with a value greater than 8192.
>>>>> 1500-030: (I) INFORMATION: balancer_handler: Additional
>>>>> optimization may be attained by recompiling and specifying MAXMEM option
>>>>> with a value greater than 8192.
>>>>> 1500-030: (I) INFORMATION: ssl_hook_Access: Additional
>>>>> optimization may be attained by recompiling and specifying MAXMEM option
>>>>> with a value greater than 8192.
>>>>> "ssl_engine_vars.c", line 88.26: 1506-068 (W) Operation between types
>>>>> "const void*" and "const char*(*)(struct {...}*,const void*)" is not
>>>>> allowed.
>>>>> "ssl_engine_vars.c", line 95.26: 1506-068 (W) Operation between types
>>>>> "const void*" and "struct apr_array_header_t*(*)(struct {...}*,const
>>>>> void*,const char*)" is not allowed.
>>>>> 1500-030: (I) INFORMATION: status_handler: Additional optimization
>>>>> may be attained by recompiling and specifying MAXMEM option with a value
>>>>> greater than 8192.
>>>>> 1500-030: (I) INFORMATION: lookup_variable: Additional
>>>>> optimization may be attained by recompiling and specifying MAXMEM option
>>>>> with a value greater than 8192.
>>>>> + make install DESTDIR=/var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10 >
>>>>> build/aix/install.out
>>>>> mkdir /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10
>>>>> mkdir /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt
>>>>> mkdir /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd
>>>>> mkdir /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec
>>>>> find: bad status--
>>>>> /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec/mod_mpm_worker.so
>>>>> install: File mod_mpm_worker.so was not found.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
