On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:05:40AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > Yes the spec is "strange" wrt digest, which is why the code looks > strange too, here is the quote from RFC 5929 (4.1):
Great, thanks. It took me two commits due to PEBKAC issues... http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1620926 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1620927 I made a couple of style & docs tweaks and adjusted the types, partly because of compiler warnings: - use apr_status_t not int for APR_* error codes in return value - switched to "unsigned char *" for the buffer type throughout - used unsigned int for the size parameter to X509_digest() Hope these are OK, let me know if not! Regards, Joe
