On 02 Nov 2014, at 4:44 PM, Graham Leggett <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't dispute that such a string "can be stored in any DN formatted >> field in LDAP", but consider the use of the "name" RDN (OID 2.5.4.41) >> fairly nonstandard. X.520 defines "Name" as "the attribute supertype >> from which string attribute types typically used for naming may be >> formed" (and "string attribute types" referring to things like >> commonName, surname etc.). "distinguishedName" (2.5.4.49) would be more >> appropriate, though it isn't really meant for use as an RDN attribute >> type (but "an attribute for specifying the name of an object" in an >> X.500 DIT). > > Good point, let me change that.
Updated patch is attached. Regards, Graham —
httpd-mod_ssl-certsubjects4.patch
Description: Binary data
