Isn't this already addressed/handled with the BalancerInherit directive??
> On Dec 10, 2014, at 7:25 AM, Jan Kaluža <jkal...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've found out that following configuration does not work as expected:
>
> <Proxy balancer://a>
> ...
> </Proxy>
> <VirtualHost *:80>
> ProxyPass / balancer://a stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid
> </VirtualHost>
>
> In this case, two proxy_balancers are created. The first one in Proxy section
> in the main config without stickysession and the second one in the vhost
> section with stickysession set.
>
> Because of merge_proxy_config behaviour, the one from the main config is
> always preferred and therefore you cannot set stickysession (and other
> options) this way.
>
> Attached patch fixes that by changing the merge strategy for balancers array
> to merge options set by ProxyPass.
>
> I think we would need the same for proxy_worker too, but before I spent
> afternoon working on it, I wanted to ask, do you think this is the right way
> how to fix this?
>
> Regards,
> Jan Kaluza
> <httpd-trunk-balancer-vhost.patch>
