On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:09 PM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Forget about or any special reasons to not include the two smal fixes? > >>> > >>> > Perhaps you can take a look into this two bug id's: >>> > >>> > - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53824 >>> > contains a corrected fix (use correct '[[1234]].*' instead single >>> > '[1234].*' ) >>> > >>> > and this one if build with dynamic modules. >>> > - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53882 >>> >
Backport proposed (STATUS) in r1652934. Since 2.4.11 may not be released, it could have a chance to be voted before 2.4.12 is RMed. Regards, Yann.
