Hi,
I would +1 for this solution which is, IMHO, much better.
However, changing the parser itself would require checking the potential
impact as it is used in many places.
CJ
Le 17/04/2015 13:15, Yann Ylavic a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote:
How about handling the case in the Require directive parser itself
(add_authz_provider)?
Or even maybe in the expr parser itself:
Index: server/util_expr_eval.c
===================================================================
--- server/util_expr_eval.c (revision 1674046)
+++ server/util_expr_eval.c (working copy)
@@ -455,6 +455,10 @@ AP_DECLARE(ap_expr_info_t*) ap_expr_parse_cmd_mi(c
info->line_number = cmd->directive->line_num;
info->flags = flags;
info->module_index = module_index;
+ if (expr && (expr[0] == '"' || expr[0] == '\'') && (expr[1] != '\0')
+ && (expr[strlen(expr) - 1] == expr[0])) {
+ expr = ap_getword_conf(cmd->temp_pool, &expr);
+ }
*err = ap_expr_parse(cmd->pool, cmd->temp_pool, info, expr, lookup_fn);
if (*err)
--
