Good point, I must have missed this discussion about "external" storage... Thanks.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > I had thought that we decided NOT to make that change for 2.4.x since > it would affect anyone who persisted balancer changes when they > upgraded... > >> On May 18, 2015, at 6:18 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote: >>> Am 23.01.2015 um 11:09 schrieb Yann Ylavic: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 1:40 PM, <j...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Author: jim >>>>> Date: Mon Oct 27 12:40:34 2014 >>>>> New Revision: 1634520 >>>>> >>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1634520 >>>>> Log: >>>>> Merge r1621367, r1621372, r1625952 from trunk: >>>>> >>>>> PR53218 >>>>> Allow for longer worker names and make truncation a non-fatal >>>>> error... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Correct loglevel. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> oops... prepend 0 >>>>> >>>>> Reviewed/backported by: jim >>>>> >>>>> Modified: >>>>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/ (props changed) >>>>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/CHANGES >>>>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS >>>>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/rewrite/advanced.xml (props >>>>> changed) >>>>> httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c >>>>> >>>> >>>> The "modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h" part of r1621367 was not merge here, ie : >>>> >>>> --- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h (original) >>>> +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h Fri Aug 29 19:17:45 2014 >>>> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ PROXY_WORKER_DISABLED | PROXY_WORKER_STO >>>> #define PROXY_WORKER_MAX_SCHEME_SIZE 16 >>>> #define PROXY_WORKER_MAX_ROUTE_SIZE 96 >>>> #define PROXY_BALANCER_MAX_ROUTE_SIZE 64 >>>> -#define PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE 96 >>>> +#define PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE 192 >>>> #define PROXY_BALANCER_MAX_NAME_SIZE 64 >>>> #define PROXY_WORKER_MAX_HOSTNAME_SIZE 96 >>>> #define PROXY_BALANCER_MAX_HOSTNAME_SIZE 64 >>>> >>>> So the worker name is still 96 bytes (max) in 2.4.x. >>> >>> >>> This hasn't changed yet. >> >> Jim, ping? >
