On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 8:56 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: wrowe > Date: Fri May 22 06:56:04 2015 > New Revision: 1681006 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1681006 > Log: > > Vote up one patch, presume lazy concensus on second patch (platform specific > with two affirmative reviewers) > > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1681006&r1=1681005&r2=1681006&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Fri May 22 06:56:04 2015 > @@ -101,6 +101,22 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: > PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: > [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ] > > + * mod_proxy: use the original (non absolute) form of the request-line's > URI > + for requests embedded in CONNECT payloads used to connect SSL backends > via > + a ProxyRemote forward-proxy. PR 55892. > + trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1665215 > + http://svn.apache.org/r1665218 (CHANGES entry) > + 2.2.x patch: trunk works (modulo CHANGES) > + +1: ylavic, wrowe
I guess this is the wrong lazy concensus...
