> On 28 May 2015, at 16:25, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > One thing I've been thinking about, and there might even be some hooks > in trunk for it, is the idea of slave connections (or sub-connections) > which kind of *is* a pseudo connection. So one could create a connection > and then a sub/slave connection from that, and then use *that* for > requests. This maintains the connection->request idea, but allows for > multiple connections and requests per a single "real" connection.
That would be useful - and perhaps fold/kill some of the internal redirect stuff in as well. Dw.
