On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 5:46 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > I don't entirely understand the patch CHANGES, however... > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:41 AM, <wr...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: >> [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ] >> >> * mod_ssl: bring SNI behavior into better conformance with RFC 6066 >> (also addresses PR 56241) >> trunk patch: https://svn.apache.org/r1585090 >> (partial, w/o startup warnings changes) >> 2.4.x patch: https://svn.apache.org/r1588424 >> (backported to 2.4.10) >> 2.2.x patch: >> http://people.apache.org/~ylavic/httpd-2.2.x-no_sni_warning.patch >> + +1: ylavic, jorton, wrowe > > > The patch claims both adjusting alerts and changing startup behavior...
The CHANGES entry is, but not the patch (and STATUS entry), as per: >> trunk patch: https://svn.apache.org/r1585090 >> (partial, w/o startup warnings changes) above. > > Everything else is commentary. When you backport, Yann, would you correct > the message? Done in r1684462. Thanks for noticing.
