Committers,

we ended up short on reviewers in the security list, and are proceeding
shortly with 2.4.14.

I can't proceed with 2.2.30 until I get a third set of eyeballs on the
2.2.30-dev backport,
could someone offer to review ASAP?  I will be tagging once the backport is
approved,
no other changes to 2.2.x. branch until 2.2.31-dev.

The defect is considered Low severity based on httpd team's initial
assessment.
The other patch coming in a moment doesn't apply to 2.2.x at all.

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:26 PM, <wr...@apache.org> wrote:

> Adjust URL for public consumption
>
> Modified:
>     httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=1684520&r1=1684519&r2=1684520&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Tue Jun  9 20:26:47 2015
> @@ -109,12 +109,12 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
>    Reported by: Régis Leroy
>
>    trunk
> +    http://svn.apache.org/r1484852
> +    http://svn.apache.org/r1684513
>    2.4.x branch
> +    http://svn.apache.org/r1684515
>    2.2.x branch
> +
> http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/httpd-2.2.x-ap_http_filter-chunked-v6.patch
>    +1: ylavic, wrowe
>    jim notes: test framework errors due to 413->400 error change [test
> adjusted]
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to